Center for Scientific Review. "A reviewer at the American National Institute of Health evaluates a grant proposal." 08/22/05 via Wikipedia. Public Domain License. |
Saturday, September 12, 2015
Draft of Quick Reference Guide
In this post I will be posting and discussing the draft of my Quick Reference Guide concerning the debate over the Creative Writing MFA. You can access by my QRG by clicking here.
In my guide I broke it up into two major sections: the supporters, as in those who believe in the value of the Creative Writing MFA, and the critics, who think that the MFA does not promote good writing and is homogenized. I would welcome feedback concerning the general understanding of my guide; as in, is the way I broke it up easily readable? Do the transitions flow together? Or should I format it a different way? In terms of evidence for both side, is there enough? If you have any other comments, feel free to share those too.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment