Reflection on Project 3 Draft

For the peer review process, I reviewed Chelsea's and Samantha's Drafts.

Who reviewed your Project 3 rough draft?
Issac reviewed my rough draft. You can access it by clicking here.

What did you think and/or feel about the feedback you received? Be explicit and clear. Tell me what helped or what confused you about the feedback you got.
I was a little surprised by the feedback I got but I think over all it will only help me to strengthen my draft and turn it into a final draft. I liked how the peer review document was split into four different sections which made it easier to understand instead of just random comments on a document. I'm glad someone read over it because they brought up stuff I didn't realize while I was writing it, like the type of argument I am using and whether that is actually the best one to use.

What aspects of Project 3 need to most work going forward [Audience, Purpose, Argumentation, or Genre]? How do you plan on addressing these areas?
I think the one that needs the most work is purpose. I essentially describe me listening to an audiobook and what I liked and disliked about it. I think I could relate that back to a broader argument about why I like printed books better and what are the pros of that and some of the cons of audiobooks. I think I could be a little more specific by adding some more information.

How are you feeling overall about the direction of your project after peer review and/or instructor conferences this week?
I'm feeling a lot better because I actually have some feedback to go off of that will help me greatly in improving my rough draft in order to turn it into a final draft. I think there's a good amount of work I still need to do but I do think it's manageable.

BrokenSphere. "Krispy Kreme glazed doughnuts." 1/30/10 via Wikipedia. Creative Commons License.